Spreadsheets and databases are where AI chatbots now save people the most time, from fixing a messy customer list to writing a SQL query or explaining what a sales trend means. Several platforms now work directly inside Excel and Google Sheets. To find out which AI is best for analyzing data, our research team ran a head-to-head study from September 29 to October 16, 2026.
We gave the same 400 data analysis requests to eight AI platforms, including six general AI assistants, Copilot in Excel and the data analysis tool Julius AI, producing 3,200 answers. The requests covered eight tasks, with 50 requests each, and used real datasets from sales, finance, marketing, health care and public records, ranging from 200 rows to more than one million. A panel of six data analysts and data scientists scored each answer from 0 to 100 without knowing which platform produced it. We also checked every calculation against the correct answer, compared every chart with the underlying data, and flagged any number that did not appear in or follow from the dataset.
Summary of Findings
- Claude is the best AI for analyzing data overall, scoring 90.2 out of 100 with Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude in Excel, followed by ChatGPT at 89.9 and Google Gemini at 88.8.
- Claude won four of the eight tasks, including statistical analysis (91.8) and explaining results (92.6). ChatGPT led building charts, Copilot in Excel led spreadsheet formulas and Gemini led working with large files.
- Claude got 97.8% of calculations right and added a number that was not in the data in only 1.4% of answers, the best rates in the study.
- Meta AI added invented numbers to 8.7% of its answers, about six times Claude’s rate.
Best AI for Analyzing Data Overall
Each platform was tested on its best available model or plan, using its built-in data tools. A platform’s overall score is the average of its scores across the eight tasks in our study, with each task weighted equally. In the table below, we rank the eight platforms from highest to lowest.
Data Analysis Scores by AI Platform (2026)
| Rank | AI Platform | Model or Tool Tested | Overall Score | Strongest Task |
| 1 | Claude | Claude Opus 5.5 with Claude in Excel | 90.2 | Explaining Results |
| 2 | ChatGPT | GPT-6 Sol with data analysis | 89.9 | Building Charts |
| 3 | Google Gemini | Gemini 4 Argon with Gemini in Sheets | 88.8 | Working With Large Files |
| 4 | Julius AI | Julius Pro plan | 87.9 | Finding Trends and Outliers |
| 5 | Microsoft Copilot | Copilot in Excel (Agent Mode) | 86.6 | Spreadsheet Formulas |
| 6 | DeepSeek | DeepSeek V4-Pro | 81.8 | Writing SQL |
| 7 | Grok | Grok 4.6 | 81.5 | Finding Trends and Outliers |
| 8 | Meta AI | Muse Spark | 77.3 | Explaining Results |

Our researchers took three main points from this data:
- We found that Claude’s lead comes from accuracy and clear explanations. It finished first or second in six of the eight tasks and led ChatGPT by 0.3 points overall.
- ChatGPT built the best charts in the study (91.7), and judges said its data analysis tool was the easiest for beginners to use.
- Julius AI, a tool built only for data analysis, ranked fourth at 87.9. It led finding trends and outliers (91.2) but trailed on spreadsheet formulas (83.4).
Best AI for Each Data Analysis Task
We split the requests evenly across eight tasks, with 50 requests per task. The best platform changed from one task to the next, so the right choice depends on the kind of work you do. The first table below shows the winner and runner-up for each task. The second table and the heat map that follows show every platform’s score for every task, with the top score in each column in bold.
Best AI Platform for Each Data Analysis Task (2026)
| Data Analysis Task | Best Platform | Score | Runner-Up | Score |
| Cleaning Messy Data | Claude | 91.4 | ChatGPT | 90.2 |
| Spreadsheet Formulas | Microsoft Copilot | 91.3 | Claude | 90.7 |
| Building Charts | ChatGPT | 91.7 | Julius AI | 90.6 |
| Statistical Analysis | Claude | 91.8 | ChatGPT | 90.6 |
| Writing SQL | Claude | 91.2 | ChatGPT | 90.3 |
| Finding Trends and Outliers | Julius AI | 91.2 | Claude | 90.4 |
| Explaining Results | Claude | 92.6 | ChatGPT | 90.8 |
| Working With Large Files | Google Gemini | 89.8 | Julius AI | 87.9 |
Data Analysis Scores by Task and AI Platform (2026)
| AI Platform | Cleaning | Formulas | Charts | Statistics | SQL | Trends | Explaining | Large Files |
| Claude | 91.4 | 90.7 | 88.6 | 91.8 | 91.2 | 90.4 | 92.6 | 85.1 |
| ChatGPT | 90.2 | 89.8 | 91.7 | 90.6 | 90.3 | 89.9 | 90.8 | 85.9 |
| Google Gemini | 88.1 | 89.6 | 89.3 | 87.4 | 89.7 | 88.2 | 88.4 | 89.8 |
| Julius AI | 89.3 | 83.4 | 90.6 | 89.1 | 86.2 | 91.2 | 85.7 | 87.9 |
| Microsoft Copilot | 87.6 | 91.3 | 87.2 | 84.3 | 84.8 | 85.6 | 85.9 | 86.4 |
| DeepSeek | 82.4 | 83.6 | 76.8 | 85.9 | 87.1 | 81.2 | 80.3 | 77.5 |
| Grok | 81.6 | 80.9 | 82.4 | 82.7 | 82.3 | 83.1 | 82.8 | 76.2 |
| Meta AI | 77.3 | 76.8 | 78.1 | 76.4 | 77.9 | 78.6 | 81.2 | 72.4 |

Here is what our team took from the task-level results:
- We found that five different platforms won at least one task. Claude won four, and ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Julius AI and Microsoft Copilot won one each.
- Working with large files produced the widest gap of any task, 17.4 points between Google Gemini (89.8) and Meta AI (72.4). Google Gemini led this task because it analyzed the largest files in full during our tests.
- Copilot in Excel led spreadsheet formulas (91.3), since it writes formulas directly into the workbook and checks them against the data. Claude in Excel was close behind at 90.7.
Accuracy: Correct Calculations, Accurate Charts and Invented Numbers
A data analysis is only useful if the numbers are right. We checked all 6,180 calculations in the platforms’ answers, such as averages, growth rates and totals, against the correct answer for each dataset. We compared every chart with the data it was built from, and flagged every answer that included a number that was not in the data and could not be calculated from it. We also recorded the largest file each platform could analyze in full. The table below is sorted by the share of calculations that were correct.
Accuracy Results by AI Platform (2026)
| AI Platform | Calculations Correct | Charts That Matched the Data | Answers With an Invented Number | Largest File Analyzed in Full (Rows) |
| Claude | 97.8% | 93.2% | 1.4% | 500,000 |
| ChatGPT | 97.1% | 95.4% | 2.1% | 1,000,000 |
| Julius AI | 96.4% | 94.8% | 1.9% | 1,000,000 |
| Google Gemini | 95.9% | 94.1% | 2.8% | 2,000,000 |
| Microsoft Copilot | 95.2% | 92.6% | 2.6% | 1,048,576 |
| DeepSeek | 93.6% | 84.7% | 5.3% | 100,000 |
| Grok | 91.8% | 88.3% | 6.2% | 250,000 |
| Meta AI | 88.4% | 85.9% | 8.7% | 50,000 |


Our researchers drew three conclusions from the accuracy data:
- We found that Claude got the most calculations right (97.8%), followed by ChatGPT (97.1%) and Julius AI (96.4%). All three run code to do the math, which cut down on arithmetic mistakes.
- ChatGPT made the most accurate charts, with 95.4% matching the data exactly. DeepSeek had the lowest rate at 84.7%, most often because of mislabeled axes or missing data points.
- Meta AI added a number that was not in the data to 8.7% of its answers, and Grok did so in 6.2%. These invented figures most often appeared when a platform could not read the whole file and filled in the gaps.
Best AI Models for Analyzing Data, Including Free Options
Many platforms give free users a different model or fewer data tools than paying subscribers. We tested 13 models and plans across the eight platforms, including each platform’s free option. The table below ranks every one we tested.
Data Analysis Scores by Model and Plan (2026)
| Rank | Model or Plan | Platform | Available On | Score |
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Claude | Paid | 90.2 |
| 2 | GPT-6 Sol | ChatGPT | Paid | 89.9 |
| 3 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Claude | Free and paid | 89.4 |
| 4 | Gemini 4 Argon | Google Gemini | Paid | 88.8 |
| 5 | Julius Pro plan | Julius AI | Paid | 87.9 |
| 6 | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Google Gemini | Free and paid | 87.3 |
| 7 | GPT-6 Luna | ChatGPT | Free and paid | 87.1 |
| 8 | Copilot in Excel (Agent Mode) | Microsoft Copilot | Paid | 86.6 |
| 9 | Julius (free plan) | Julius AI | Free | 84.2 |
| 10 | GPT-6 Astra (Copilot app) | Microsoft Copilot | Free and paid | 82.4 |
| 11 | DeepSeek V4-Pro | DeepSeek | Free | 81.8 |
| 12 | Grok 4.6 | Grok | Free and paid | 81.5 |
| 13 | Muse Spark | Meta AI | Free | 77.3 |

Our team took three main points from the model-level results:
- We found that Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the best free AI for analyzing data, scoring 89.4, behind only Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol.
- Paying for Microsoft Copilot added the most of any platform: Copilot in Excel scored 4.2 points higher than the free Copilot app, because it works directly inside the spreadsheet.
- Julius AI’s free plan scored 84.2, 3.7 points below its Pro plan, which allows larger files and more analyses each month.
Requesting a Copy of This Report
If you’d like to request a PDF copy of this report or learn more about our agency, you can reach out here.
- First Page Sage Research Study, First Page Sage, September to October 2026, San Francisco, California
- Agent Mode Is Now Available in Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, Computerworld, April 2026, Framingham, Massachusetts
- Google Rolls Out New Gemini Capabilities to Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Drive, TechCrunch, March 2026, San Francisco, California
- Anthropic Activates Claude’s Excel Integration for All Pro Subscribers, The Decoder, January 2026, Hannover, Germany


